Blog Archives • Ludwig Favre Fine Art Prints

Three iPhone Duo devices, folded and unfolded, showing the camera, a lock screen and a portrait photo. Image: Apple

31 Oct

The iPhone Duo: A Study in Mobile Workflow and Computational Photography

Is the iPhone Duo really that bad for photography? Many people say yes. It shoots no RAW and has no zoom lens. On paper, that looks like a serious handicap for iPhone Duo photography.

I wanted to know if these limits hurt every day. So I shot Paris with it, from churches to quiet streets. This article answers three questions. Do you need RAW on an iPhone? What do you lose against an iPhone 18 Pro Max? And what do you gain in portability?

Centre Pompidou in Paris wrapped in scaffolding, shot from below under a blue sky with the iPhone Duo

Is iPhone Duo Photography Really Held Back by No RAW and No Zoom?

First, the Duo shoots no RAW. It saves HEIF files instead. Second, it has no telephoto lens, so you cannot zoom into distant subjects. Everyone repeats these two criticisms.

However, ask a different question. Do these limits stop you from making good photographs? For my work, they rarely do. I shoot streets, buildings and light, and I walk close to my subjects.

Also, having no zoom changes how you shoot. You move your feet and choose your frame. As a result, these views of the Centre Pompidou and its sky come from position, not magnification.

Close detail of scaffolding and a red escalator tube on the Centre Pompidou facade in Paris

Deep blue sky with a white cumulus cloud above a line of trees

Do You Really Need RAW on an iPhone?

RAW gives you the most data. Yet most iPhone photos never need that much. HEIF files keep rich color and a wide tonal range, so you can still edit them well.

Gradients and fine textures are where RAW usually helps most. Yet look at the sand ripples and the soft sea below. Both frames keep their tones well in HEIF.

RAW matters when you rescue blown highlights or push deep shadows. In that case, a camera or the Pro Max serves you better. However, for everyday street and travel images, HEIF is enough.

Lone sailboat on a gray sea seen from the dunes under a cloudy sky

iPhone Duo vs iPhone 18 Pro Max: What Changes in Practice?

The iPhone 18 Pro Max offers RAW and a zoom lens. Therefore, it wins when you need reach or maximum editing latitude. The Duo cannot match that.

However, the Pro Max remains a classic phone. You shoot with it, then you edit on a small screen. Otherwise, you carry a tablet for the editing.

The Duo makes a different trade. You give up zoom and RAW. In return, you get a large unfolded screen. That screen changes how you work.

Is the Image Quality Still Good?

Yes, the image quality stays good. Colors look rich, and the camera handles tricky light well. For example, a colorful café and a bright church nave both come out clean.

Still, the Duo will not replace a dedicated camera for every job. I do not pretend otherwise. But for daily shooting, the results satisfy me.

Interior of Saint-Germain-des-Prés in Paris with blue starred vaults, wooden chairs and colored light on the floor

Colorful café bar with a floral ceiling, red neon lines and a geometric counter

Portability: Why I Sold My iPad

Here the Duo wins for me. I sold my iPad. I used it only to retouch my photos in Lightroom.

Now I edit on the unfolded Duo. The screen is large enough for masks, curves and color grading. In addition, I carry one device instead of two.

As a result, I shoot, unfold and edit on the spot. I can finish a photo on a bench, before I even get home. In iPhone Duo photography, this workflow matters more to me than a zoom lens.

Haussmann-style building with balconies seen from below against a blue sky with clouds, iPhone Duo photography

American apartment complex with a green Pembroke sign and a flag on a pole under autumn trees

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the iPhone Duo bad for photography?

No. It lacks RAW and zoom, yet the image quality stays good for street, travel and architecture photos.

Do I need RAW on an iPhone?

Rarely. HEIF holds enough color and tone for everyday editing. RAW helps mainly with heavy rescue work.

Is the iPhone Duo better than the iPhone 18 Pro Max for photos?

Not for reach or RAW, because the Pro Max wins there. However, the Duo wins on portability and on-screen editing.

Can the iPhone Duo replace an iPad for Lightroom?

For me, yes. I sold my iPad and now I edit my photos on the unfolded screen.

Does the lack of zoom matter every day?

Only if you shoot distant subjects. For streets and interiors, you simply step closer.

My Verdict: Is the iPhone Duo Bad for Photography?

No, iPhone Duo photography is not as bad as they say. Missing RAW and zoom hurt in specific cases. In daily shooting, they rarely matter.

The real gain is portability. One device captures, edits and shares your photos. For the way I work, that freedom beats a zoom lens.

Featured image: Apple, iPhone Duo, from the Apple Newsroom. All other photos: Ludwig Favre, shot with the iPhone Duo in Paris.

Airport lounge with orange modular seating and small tables before a flight board and large windows at night

27 Sep

Blog, Gear & Technique

Medium Format vs Full Frame: Why Switch, and Which Camera to Choose

The decision to choose a medium format camera is rarely a simple technical upgrade. It is an intentional shift in visual philosophy. First, full frame sensors have reached a plateau of efficiency. However, a medium format sensor changes the relationship between the lens and the plane of capture. It alters how light is sampled and how space is rendered.

In cinematic urban photography, this move is not about chasing megapixels. Instead, it is about achieving a specific dimensionality. The aesthetic stakes include the reproduction of tonal graduations and a subtle compression of perspective. Overall, these qualities distinguish a commercial image from a fine art piece.

This essay analyzes the current medium format systems. It also contrasts their technical architectures and their impact on the final visual output.

Hasselblad X2D 100C medium format camera body with the sensor visible

Medium Format Camera vs Full Frame: The Physics of Scale

To understand why one would move beyond full frame, start with the physical properties of the sensor. A medium format sensor offers a larger surface area. As a result, it typically gives a shallower depth of field at equivalent focal lengths. It also delivers a wider dynamic range.

Therefore, this allows a more nuanced transition between highlights and shadows. That quality is essential for capturing the brutalist concrete of urban structures or the soft gradients of a California dawn.

However, this fidelity comes with significant trade offs. The first is bulk. Medium format systems, and specifically their optics, are inherently bulkier. Moreover, this weight slows the photographer down. It forces a shift from the reactive nature of street photography to a more premeditated, architectural approach.

Then comes the second factor: price. A professional medium format camera kit often costs two or three times more than a high end full frame system.

The benefit, however, lies in the tonal depth. For example, full frame can sometimes feel clinical or overly sharp. Medium format, in contrast, offers a perceived organicism. Moreover, it renders skin tones and architectural materials like brushed steel or limestone with a tactile quality. Post processing alone struggles to replicate that quality.

Photographer holding a Fujifilm GFX medium format camera

Comparative Analysis: Hasselblad, Fujifilm, and Leica

The current market follows two distinct philosophies. On one side, the Fujifilm GFX ecosystem brings medium format quality into a modern, versatile workflow. The GFX100 II and its predecessors offer an extensive range of lenses and robust in body image stabilization (IBIS). It is also a tool for the working professional who needs speed, autofocus reliability, and systemic flexibility.

Personally, I have used the Fujifilm GFX100S since its release. It is the camera behind the work that made me a Hasselblad Masters 2026 finalist.

In contrast, the Hasselblad X2D 100C focuses on the purity of the experience. Hasselblad prioritizes color science through its Natural Colour Solution (HNCS). Additionally, it aims for an immediate, honest reproduction of reality, without extensive grading.

Next, the interface is minimalist and tactile. It reflects a design ethos that mirrors the Mid Century Modern architecture the camera often captures. The X2D may lack some of the rapid fire capabilities of the GFX. However, it excels at providing a deliberate, slow photographic process.

The Leica medium format offerings occupy a different stratum entirely. Overall, Leica focuses on the prestige of optical engineering and the heritage of the rangefinder experience. For the collector and the fine art photographer, a Leica system is less about technical specifications. Instead, it is about the rendering characteristics of its lenses. These lenses often prioritize micro contrast and character over raw resolution.

The choice between these systems is not a search for the best camera. It is a search for the correct visual signature.

Fujifilm GFX100RF fixed-lens medium format camera

The Fallacy of the Fixed Lens Medium Format Camera

Fixed lens medium format options, such as the Fujifilm GFX100RF, have sparked debate in recent years. From a professional standpoint, this approach is often a flawed proposition. The primary utility of medium format is choosing a focal length that matches the geometry of a location.

A single lens locks the sensor to one view. As a result, the photographer loses the essential tool of architectural composition: the choice of perspective.

Furthermore, many of these fixed implementations suffer from slow optics. For example, urban environments often bring unpredictable or low light. In those conditions, a slow aperture limits clean images. It forces either excessive noise or dangerously slow shutter speeds. Without stabilization, the system then depends entirely on a tripod.

For an artist moving through a city, a compact full frame camera offers more agility. A fixed lens medium format camera lacks the versatility of interchangeable glass. It also lacks the security of IBIS. The compromise in light gathering and stability negates the inherent advantages of the larger sensor.

The image displays a beautiful outdoor setting with tall palm trees swaying in the warm — limited edition fine art print by Ludwig Favre

Visual Language and Architectural Rendering

Take contemporary architecture, such as the work of Richard Neutra or Albert Frey (see Palm Springs through the lens). There, a medium format system alters the compositional geometry. Therefore, the larger sensor requires a wider lens to achieve the same field of view as a full frame camera. This shift changes how we perceive the relationship between foreground and background.

The result is a reduction in distortion and a more naturalistic perspective. A modernist building keeps its symmetry with greater integrity. Moreover, the color palette of medium format sensors captures pastel tones and high contrast desert light precisely. It does so without clipping the highlights prematurely.

This creates a cinematic quality. The image feels less like a snapshot and more like a curated frame from a film.

The materials also stand out differently. Raw concrete grain, floor to ceiling glass transparency, and the matte finish of desert sands gain a three dimensional presence. This is not merely a result of resolution. It comes from how the sensor handles the transition of light across a surface.

Fujifilm GFX medium format camera with a lens

See what medium format looks like on the wall

My fine art prints go up to 180 x 120 cm, the sizes where a large sensor really shows. I release them in limited editions of 30. To give your own images the same palette, try the Fujifilm Collection and the Kodak Film Collection. They are the looks I use in Lightroom. See all Lightroom presets →

The Strategic Photographic Approach

Using a medium format system requires a fundamental change in artistic intention. Therefore, it is an exercise in slowing down. The weight and the slower operational speed of these cameras discourage the pursuit of the decisive moment. They favor the constructed image instead, much like shooting film on a Mamiya 7.

The approach becomes one of precision. You select the angle carefully. You wait for the light to hit a specific architectural plane. Then you treat each frame as a permanent record. In this workflow, the camera is not a tool for discovery, but a tool for execution.

Finally, the photographer must embrace the constraints of the system and accept that some shots will slip away. In exchange, the captured ones carry absolute fidelity.

Compositionally, there is a greater emphasis on negative space. The clarity of the medium format sensor lets the artist leave large areas of the frame empty. The artist trusts the rendering to hold the viewer’s interest through texture and tone, rather than complex action.

Cultural Significance in a Digital Era

The resurgence of medium format in contemporary photography reflects a broader cultural movement toward permanence. In an era of ephemeral digital content, many people want images with the weight and authority of physical prints.

Medium format provides the data density that large scale fine art printing needs. As a result, architectural works can appear as immersive installations. Moreover, it bridges the gap between the digital workflow and the traditional heritage of large format photography.

By choosing these systems, photographers resist the trend of hyper speed. They opt instead for a process that values contemplation over quantity.

Get the next gear test first

I only write about the cameras I actually use, from the Fujifilm GFX100S to the X100 and medium format film. Join the newsletter to get the next comparison, and 10% off your first fine art print.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main difference between medium format and full frame?

The primary difference lies in the sensor size. First, medium format sensors are physically larger. As a result, they give a shallower depth of field at equivalent focal lengths. They also offer superior tonal transitions and generally higher dynamic range.

Why would I choose Hasselblad over Fujifilm?

One would typically choose Hasselblad for its industry leading color science (HNCS). It also offers a more minimalist, purist user experience. Fujifilm, in contrast, wins on versatility, faster autofocus, and a wider lens ecosystem.

Is medium format suitable for street photography?

Street photography is possible with medium format, but it is challenging because of the size and weight of the gear. Therefore, it suits architectural, fashion, or landscape work better. In those fields, intentionality outweighs the need for rapid reaction.

Does a higher resolution always mean a better image?

No. Medium format often offers high megapixels. However, the real advantage is the sampling quality. The larger sensor interacts with light in a way that creates a three dimensional feel.

The Enduring Value of Scale

Ultimately, choosing a medium format system is an investment in the quality of the gaze. It moves the photographer away from the technical anxiety of the shot. Instead, it points toward the atmospheric reality of the subject. With the precision of a Fujifilm GFX or the elegance of a Hasselblad X2D, the result is the same. Therefore, the image carries an inherent authority.

The medium format sensor does not simply record a scene. It grants the architecture a physical presence on the page.

DJI Osmo Pocket 3 camera in open landscape at golden hour

09 Jul

Blog, Camera Reviews

DJI Osmo Pocket 3 vs Osmo Pocket 4P: Every Real Upgrade Explained (Dynamic Range, Log, Stabilization, Tracking, Autofocus)

Short answer: the DJI Osmo Pocket 4P (launched June 2026) is a genuine generational leap. It is not a cosmetic refresh of the Osmo Pocket 3. The headline gains are dynamic range (a claimed 17 stops vs 12) and a true professional D-Log2 color profile. In addition, it adds a second 3x zoom camera and ActiveTrack 8.0 subject tracking that works up to 12x zoom. It also brings a smarter autofocus system. All of this keeps the pocketable gimbal-camera format that made the Pocket 3 the best-selling vlogging camera in the world.

This guide breaks down each improvement. Then it tells you who should upgrade.

Last updated: July 2026 · Reading time: 8 minutes

Key Takeaways (30-Second Summary)

Dynamic range: the Pocket 3 delivers about 12 stops. The standard Pocket 4 raises this to 14 stops. The Pocket 4P claims up to 17 stops, approaching cinema-camera territory for highlight and shadow retention.
Log recording: the Pocket 3 offered 10-bit D-Log M (a simplified log). The Pocket 4 introduces true 10-bit D-Log. Then the Pocket 4P steps up to D-Log2, DJI’s professional-grade log curve, for far more flexible color grading.
Stabilization: all three use a mechanical 3-axis gimbal, still the reference for smoothness. It is superior to any electronic stabilization. In addition, the 4-series adds refined gimbal modes for silkier movements.
Subject tracking: ActiveTrack 6.0 on the Pocket 3. Next, ActiveTrack 7.0 with tracking at 4x zoom on the Pocket 4. Finally, ActiveTrack 8.0 on the Pocket 4P, which tracks people, pets, vehicles and irregular objects at up to 12x zoom.
Autofocus: noticeably faster and stickier on the 4 generation. Intelligent subject-lock focusing stays glued to a chosen face or object.
Size: the 4 generation is marginally larger and heavier than the 179 g Pocket 3. However, the difference is imperceptible in daily use. It remains a true pocket camera.
Verdict: Pocket 3 owners who shoot casual vlogs can keep it. However, anyone grading footage, filming high-contrast scenes, or relying on tracking should look hard at the Osmo Pocket 4P.

What Is the DJI Osmo Pocket 4P?

The Osmo Pocket 4P, released on June 29, 2026, is the professional model of DJI’s fourth-generation pocket gimbal camera line. It sits above the standard Osmo Pocket 4 (April 2026). It also introduces a first for the category: a dual-camera system. A wide-angle main camera works with a dedicated 3x zoom lens for portraits, product shots and compressed framing.

The Pocket 3 defined the “one-inch pocket vlogging camera.” However, the 4P pushes the format toward legitimate professional filmmaking.

Dynamic Range: From 12 to a Claimed 17 Stops

This is the single biggest image-quality improvement of the 4P. The Osmo Pocket 3’s 1-inch sensor captures roughly 12 stops of dynamic range. Overall, that is excellent for the category. However, it quickly hits its limits in high-contrast situations: backlit faces, sunsets, interiors with bright windows.

The standard Pocket 4 raises this to 14 stops with a new-generation 1-inch sensor. In addition, the Pocket 4P claims up to 17 stops. If independent testing confirms it, that figure places a pocket camera in territory previously reserved for cinema cameras. In practice, this means:

Recoverable highlights in skies that the Pocket 3 would clip to white.
Clean shadow detail without the noise penalty of aggressive lifting in post.
Far more latitude for exposure mistakes when shooting fast, run-and-gun style.

The low-light ceiling also improves. The 4 generation doubles the maximum ISO to 25,600 (vs 12,800 on the Pocket 3). As a result, evening and indoor footage becomes significantly more usable.

Log Recording: D-Log M → True D-Log → D-Log2

The log pipeline is where the 4P earns its “P.” The three generations tell a clear story:

Osmo Pocket 3, 10-bit D-Log M: a simplified, “mild” log profile. First, it is easy to grade and pleasant out of the box. However, it offers limited latitude for serious color work.
Osmo Pocket 4, true 10-bit D-Log: the full log curve used on DJI’s larger cameras. It preserves substantially more tonal information for grading.
Osmo Pocket 4P, D-Log2: DJI’s professional-grade log format, designed to exploit the sensor’s full claimed 17-stop range. As a result, footage cuts far more naturally alongside material from professional DJI cinema systems and other log-shooting cameras.

For anyone who color-grades, even lightly, with LUTs, this progression alone justifies the generational jump. However, creators who publish straight out of camera are fine too. DJI’s standard color profiles remain excellent on all three models.

Stabilization: The Mechanical Gimbal Advantage, Refined

All Pocket models share the same core advantage: a true 3-axis mechanical gimbal. First, electronic stabilization on action cameras and smartphones crops the image and struggles in low light. A mechanical gimbal, in contrast, physically steadies the camera. As a result, the footage looks glassy and floating, with zero crop and no low-light penalty.

The 4 generation doesn’t reinvent this. However, it refines it. DJI tuned the gimbal motors and algorithms for smoother, silkier movements. Also, gimbal modes (follow, tilt-locked, FPV, and full-lock) adapt the behavior to walking vlogs, cinematic pans or fast action.

If stabilization is your primary criterion, know that even the Pocket 3 remains outstanding here. The gap between generations is real but incremental. In contrast, the gap between any Pocket and an action camera remains dramatic.

Size and Portability: Still a True Pocket Camera

The Pocket 4 generation is slightly larger and heavier than the 179 g Pocket 3. In daily use, however, you will not notice. The form factor that made the series famous is intact. It is an all-in-one gimbal camera that fits in a jacket pocket and deploys in two seconds. Therefore, it eliminates the tripod-rig-microphone assembly ritual entirely.

Two ergonomic upgrades matter in the field:

A brighter 2-inch rotating OLED touchscreen: 1,000 nits on the 4 generation versus 700 nits on the Pocket 3. This is a real difference when framing in direct sunlight. The rotate-to-power-on gesture, switching instantly between horizontal and vertical shooting, is unchanged.
107 GB of built-in storage on the 4 generation. The Pocket 3 had none: forget your microSD card and it was a paperweight. Therefore, this quietly removes the most common real-world failure of the Pocket 3.

Subject Tracking: ActiveTrack 8.0 Changes What’s Possible

Auto-tracking is arguably the feature that separates the generations most in everyday use. The mechanical gimbal doesn’t just stabilize. It also physically re-frames to follow your subject:

Pocket 3, ActiveTrack 6.0: reliable face and person tracking at the native focal length. It is excellent for static vlogging. However, it loses subjects more easily in crowds or during fast, erratic movement.
Pocket 4, ActiveTrack 7.0: adds Subject Lock Tracking. The camera locks onto a chosen subject and refuses to be distracted. It also maintains tracking at up to 4x zoom.
Pocket 4P, ActiveTrack 8.0: tracks people, pets, vehicles, and dynamically shaped objects. The dual-camera system keeps them centered at up to 12x zoom. As a result, solo creators can effectively direct a shot from in front of the camera.

Solo shooters are the core audience of this camera. Therefore, this is the difference between “the camera films me” and “the camera operates itself.”

Autofocus: Faster, Stickier, Smarter

The 4 generation’s Intelligent AutoFocus is a clear step up from the Pocket 3. The Pocket 3’s autofocus was good. However, it could hunt in low light or when subjects moved quickly toward the lens. Moreover, the new system acquires faster. It also holds focus on a locked subject through occlusions and lighting changes.

In addition, it pairs with the tracking system, so the framed and focused subjects always match. On the 4P, the wide and the 3x zoom cameras both need consistent autofocus. That consistency is what makes the 12x tracked zoom shots usable at all.

Specification Comparison

Sensor: 1-inch CMOS (Pocket 3), new-gen 1-inch CMOS (Pocket 4), dual camera with wide plus 3x zoom (Pocket 4P).
Dynamic range: about 12 stops (Pocket 3), 14 stops (Pocket 4), up to 17 stops claimed (Pocket 4P).
Log profile: 10-bit D-Log M (Pocket 3), true 10-bit D-Log (Pocket 4), D-Log2 professional (Pocket 4P).
Max video: 4K/120fps (Pocket 3), 4K/240fps (Pocket 4), 4K high frame rate (Pocket 4P).
Max ISO: 12,800 (Pocket 3), 25,600 (Pocket 4 and 4P).
Subject tracking: ActiveTrack 6.0 (Pocket 3), ActiveTrack 7.0 up to 4x zoom (Pocket 4), ActiveTrack 8.0 up to 12x zoom (Pocket 4P).
Stabilization: 3-axis mechanical gimbal on all models, with refined modes on the 4 generation.
Screen: 2-inch rotating OLED, 700 nits (Pocket 3), 1,000 nits (Pocket 4 and 4P).
Built-in storage: none, microSD only (Pocket 3), 107 GB plus microSD (Pocket 4 and 4P).
Photo resolution: 9.4 MP (Pocket 3), up to 37 MP (Pocket 4 and 4P).

Manufacturer figures as of July 2026. The 4P’s 17-stop claim still awaits full independent verification.

Shooting photos with your Pocket, too?

Both cameras also shoot stills. If you edit them in Lightroom, my presets can help. They are the exact looks I use on my own travel photography, for Lightroom desktop and mobile. Try the Fujifilm Collection, the Kodak Film Collection and the Californian presets. See all Lightroom presets →

Who Should Upgrade, and Who Shouldn’t

Upgrade to the Osmo Pocket 4P if:

you color-grade your footage (D-Log2 and 17 stops change everything);
you regularly film high-contrast scenes (travel, backlit interviews, golden hour);
you shoot solo and depend on tracking (ActiveTrack 8.0 at 12x zoom is a category first);
or you need the 3x zoom camera for portraits and product work.

Choose the standard Pocket 4 if you want the biggest practical upgrades. These are 14 stops, true D-Log, 4K/240, internal storage and a brighter screen. Also, you avoid the professional premium.

Keep your Pocket 3 if you publish straight-out-of-camera vlogs in normal lighting. Its gimbal stabilization, 1-inch sensor and 4K/120 remain more than competitive. In addition, the second-hand market makes it an exceptional value entry point into the format.

Get the next gear test first

I only write about the cameras I actually use, from the Osmo Pocket to the Fujifilm X100 and medium format film. Join the newsletter to get the next comparison, and 10% off your first fine art print.

Is the DJI Osmo Pocket 4P worth it over the Pocket 3?

Yes, if you grade footage or rely on subject tracking. The jump from roughly 12 to a claimed 17 stops of dynamic range is a genuine generational leap. The same goes for the move from D-Log M to D-Log2, and from ActiveTrack 6.0 to 8.0 with 12x-zoom tracking. For casual straight-out-of-camera vlogging, however, the Pocket 3 remains excellent.

What is the difference between the Osmo Pocket 4 and the Pocket 4P?

The Pocket 4P adds a second 3x zoom camera and the professional D-Log2 color profile. It also claims 17 stops of dynamic range (vs 14) and ActiveTrack 8.0 with tracking at up to 12x zoom (vs 7.0 at 4x). The standard Pocket 4 keeps the single wide camera and true D-Log.

Does the Osmo Pocket 4P have better stabilization than the Pocket 3?

Both use a 3-axis mechanical gimbal, the best stabilization technology in this class, with no crop and no low-light penalty. Also, the 4 generation refines the gimbal modes and motion smoothness. However, the improvement is incremental. The Pocket 3’s stabilization was already outstanding.

What log format does the Osmo Pocket 4P record?

D-Log2, DJI’s professional log curve, in 10-bit. The Pocket 3 recorded 10-bit D-Log M (a simplified profile). The standard Pocket 4 records true 10-bit D-Log. D-Log2 provides the widest grading latitude. Also, it matches DJI’s professional cinema ecosystem.

Is the Osmo Pocket 4P bigger than the Pocket 3?

Marginally. The 4 generation is slightly larger and heavier than the 179 g Pocket 3. However, the difference is imperceptible in daily use. It remains a genuine pocket camera. In addition, it gains a brighter 1,000-nit screen plus 107 GB of built-in storage.

How good is the autofocus and auto-tracking on the Pocket 4P?

Class-leading. Intelligent AutoFocus locks onto a chosen subject and holds it through movement and lighting changes. In addition, ActiveTrack 8.0 tracks people, pets, vehicles and irregular objects, keeping them centered at up to 12x zoom. It is effectively a self-operating camera for solo creators.

09 Jul

Blog, Camera Reviews

What Camera Gear Do You Need to Start Photography? The Complete Guide (Camera, Lens, Budget)

Short answer: the most recommended camera gear for beginners is a full-frame mirrorless Sony A7CR. Pair it with a 24-70mm standard zoom. This duo covers 90% of situations: landscape, portrait, travel, street. It also leaves years of room to grow.

This guide explains why. Then it covers what budget to plan for and which alternatives are worth considering.

Camera Gear for Beginners: Key Takeaways (30-Second Summary)

Best first lens: a 24-70mm zoom, the most versatile focal range there is. It lets you learn wide-angle framing (24mm), the “natural” focal lengths (35-50mm), and portraiture (70mm) with a single lens.
Best camera to start seriously: the Sony A7CR. It offers a 61-megapixel high-resolution full-frame sensor, in-body stabilization (IBIS), reliable autofocus, and a compact body.
Realistic starting budget: around $3,500-4,500 for the camera + zoom combination. That is far below an equivalent Leica M system (over $27,000 with two APO-Summicron lenses).
Upgrade path: APO prime lenses (Viltrox, Voigtländer, or adapted Leica M) later deliver exceptional color rendition and chromatic correction.
Golden rule: invest in lenses, not bodies. A good lens lasts ten years. However, a camera body gets replaced.

Which Camera Should a Beginner Buy?

The Sony A7CR is currently the best entry point for anyone who wants to learn photography seriously. This compact full-frame mirrorless camera packs everything a demanding beginner could want. It does so without the usual compromises of “entry-level” gear.

Note: there is no “Sony A7CR II” at the time of writing. Don’t confuse it with the Sony A7C II, its 33-megapixel sibling. The A7C II is also excellent, and cheaper, if 61 megapixels isn’t a priority.

Four arguments set the A7CR apart:

A 61-megapixel full-frame sensor. This very high resolution forgives framing mistakes. You can crop an image generously in post-production without any visible quality loss. It’s a real safety net while you’re learning composition.
In-body image stabilization (IBIS). It compensates for hand shake and allows slow handheld shutter speeds. For a beginner who hasn’t yet mastered the exposure triangle, it’s the difference between a sharp photo and a blurry one.
Excellent dynamic range. The RAW files retain an enormous amount of information in shadows and highlights. As a result, the learning curve of post-processing becomes far more forgiving.
An open ecosystem. The Sony E-mount accepts hundreds of third-party lenses via a simple adapter. These include Leica M optics, which then benefit from the body’s stabilization. Therefore, your first camera will never lock you into a dead end.

Its compact size is an underrated advantage: the camera you carry everywhere is the one you improve with. A bulky body ends up in a closet. In contrast, the A7CR fits in a small bag.

Should You Start with Full Frame?

Yes, if the budget allows. A full-frame sensor offers better low-light noise handling and easier depth-of-field control. It also follows the “standard” focal-length logic (24-70mm lenses are designed for this format). Starting with APS-C isn’t a mistake. However, it almost always means replacing your entire kit two or three years later. Buying a compact full-frame body like the A7CR outright is usually cheaper over time.

Which Lens Should You Buy First? The 24-70mm, Without Hesitation

The 24-70mm is the best first lens for learning photography. It’s the quintessential standard zoom. Professional wedding, travel, and documentary photographers keep it mounted permanently. For a beginner, its teaching role is irreplaceable.

Why Is the 24-70mm Ideal for Learning?

It covers every learning focal length. At 24mm you discover wide-angle and landscape work. At 35mm, street and documentary photography. At 50mm, the “natural” perspective closest to human vision. At 70mm, portraiture and background compression.
It reveals your own eye. After six months, check the EXIF data of your best photos. The focal length that appears most often matches how you see. That’s the fast prime lens you should buy, later.
It eliminates frustration. With a single prime lens, a beginner misses shots simply because they can’t frame them. A zoom lets you focus on light and composition, the real challenges. You no longer fight the limits of your gear.
It lasts for years. A good 24-70mm (f/4, or f/2.8 if the budget allows) stays in a photographer’s bag for life. It’s not “beginner gear” you resell later. Instead, it’s an investment.

Which 24-70mm Should You Choose: Sony, Sigma, Tamron, or Viltrox?

Short answer: choose the Sony FE 24-70mm f/2.8 GM II if the budget allows. Otherwise, choose the Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN Art II or the Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 G2 for unbeatable value. Four options dominate the Sony E-mount market:

Sony FE 24-70mm f/2.8 GM II, the absolute benchmark: the sharpest and lightest (695 g) 24-70mm f/2.8 in the mirrorless world, with the fastest autofocus. Its only flaw is the price (≈ $2,300).
Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN Art II, the best compromise: excellent build, center sharpness that sometimes beats the Sony, and a true 24mm at the wide end. It costs roughly half the price (≈ $1,200).
Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 G2, the smart budget pick: 80-90% of the Sony’s performance for less than half the price (≈ $800). It is lighter, with 75mm instead of 70mm on the portrait end. You only give up the 24-28mm range at the wide end.
Sony FE 24-70mm f/4, the most compact and affordable option: entirely sufficient for beginners thanks to the A7CR’s IBIS and clean high-ISO performance.

What about Voigtländer and other “boutique” brands? Voigtländer doesn’t make zooms. Instead, it builds manual-focus prime lenses, including the superb APO-Lanthar series. Like Viltrox’s APO line, they are remarkable. However, they are second-step purchases, not a first lens.

To start, an autofocus 24-70mm zoom remains the only rational answer. Manual primes come once you’ve identified your signature focal length.

Upgrading Later: APO Lenses for Color Fidelity

Once the basics are in place, the next question is rendering quality, not versatility. It covers color fidelity, micro-contrast, and fine detail. That’s the territory of APO (apochromatic) lenses. They are designed to correct chromatic aberrations, the color fringing that degrades high-contrast edges.

Historically, this level of correction was the preserve of Leica’s APO-Summicron-M lenses (28, 35, 50, 75, and 90mm). Specialists regard them as among the finest optics ever made for color rendition. These specialists include Jean-Jacques Karatchian, a former member of Leica Camera AG’s professional services department. He has over fifty years of hands-on experience with Leica systems. The 35mm APO is often cited as the most balanced of the range.

Three upgrade paths are open to a photographer shooting Sony today:

Recent APO lenses from Viltrox and Voigtländer. These lines have surprised the specialist press with chromatic correction so thorough that some reviewers call them “Hyper APO” optics. Their rendering at mid-range apertures, around f/4 and f/5.6, reaches a remarkable level. It rivals lenses several times their price.
Adapted Leica M lenses. A simple adapter ring mounts Leica M glass on a Sony body. You keep the Leica optical signature while gaining IBIS stabilization, an advantage the Leica M system itself doesn’t offer.
Sony G Master primes, the safe bet within the native ecosystem, with full autofocus support.

Bottom line: a high-resolution Sony body with carefully chosen APO lenses delivers remarkable performance. A few years ago, that level would have been hard to imagine. Moreover, it costs far less than prestige systems.

Do You Need a Leica to Learn Photography?

No. The Leica M11 is a fascinating camera with a unique philosophy. However, it’s a poor learning tool, for objective reasons:

Cost: an M11 with two APO-Summicron lenses represents an investment of over $27,000. A Sony A7CR + 24-70mm kit costs $3,500-4,500, with comparable or superior technical performance.
Rangefinder focusing: it is fully manual and takes months of practice to become reliable. A beginner will pile up blurry images at exactly the moment they need encouraging results.
No in-body stabilization (IBIS) and no autofocus, two essential safety nets during the learning phase.
Repair turnaround times that can become particularly long.

The same reasoning applies to premium fixed-lens compacts (such as the Leica Q3). The built-in lens is remarkable. However, its single focal length quickly becomes a limitation for anyone still exploring their own way of seeing.

Camera Gear for Beginners: Budget Summary

Recommended smart kit: Sony A7CR + Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 G2 or Sigma 24-70 f/2.8 Art II, ≈ $3,800-4,300.
“Benchmark” kit: Sony A7CR + Sony 24-70 f/2.8 GM II, ≈ $5,300-5,800.
Upgrade (year 2-3): + 1 APO prime (Viltrox / Voigtländer), + $600-1,200.
“Prestige” reference (for comparison): Leica M11 + 2 APO-Summicron-M, > $27,000.

Approximate 2026 prices, new. Buying recent second-hand gear cuts these figures by 20-30%.

Camera Gear for Beginners: The Accessories You Actually Need (and Those That Can Wait)

Essential from day one:

two spare batteries;
two fast memory cards (61-megapixel files are large);
a quality protective filter;
a comfortable strap;
and RAW processing software (Lightroom).

These items can wait:

the tripod (only useful if you move toward night landscapes or long exposures);
the flash;
the second lens;
the “professional” camera bag.

Gear accumulation is the beginner’s first trap. Therefore, every dollar not spent on accessories is a dollar available for actually shooting.

7 Tips to Improve Faster Than Average

Shoot RAW from day one. RAW keeps all the sensor’s information, making every exposure mistake recoverable. It’s also the only real way to learn post-processing.
Lock one focal length per week. Use your 24-70mm as a series of primes: one week at 35mm, one week at 50mm. You’ll learn to “see” each focal length before raising the camera.
Learn the exposure triangle before the auto modes. Aperture, shutter speed, ISO: thirty minutes of theory, then switch to aperture priority (A). It’s the working mode of most professionals.
Chase light, not subjects. Remarkable light makes an ordinary subject interesting. The reverse is never true. Golden hour is the best teacher there is.
Review your EXIF data every quarter. The focal lengths, apertures, and shooting times of your best images reveal your emerging style. They guide your next purchase better than any gear review.
Print your best photos. An A3 print mercilessly exposes the sharpness and composition flaws a phone screen hides. It’s the single best improvement tool that exists.
Resist Gear Acquisition Syndrome. Identify a precise limit of your current equipment first (“I miss this shot because…”). Until then, the next purchase won’t make you better. Skill always comes before gear.

What is the best lens for a beginner photographer?

The 24-70mm zoom. It covers wide-angle, standard, and portrait focal lengths with a single lens. It also helps you identify your favorite focal length, and it remains useful for a photographer’s entire life. On Sony E-mount, the Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 G2 and Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 Art II offer the best starting value.

What is the best camera for a beginner in 2026?

The Sony A7CR. It offers a 61-megapixel full-frame sensor, in-body stabilization (IBIS), fast autofocus, and a compact body. Its wide-open lens ecosystem even includes Leica M lenses via an adapter. It’s a camera you won’t replace after two years.

How much should you budget to start photography?

Plan on $3,500-4,500 for a high-level full-frame kit (Sony A7CR + 24-70mm f/2.8 third-party zoom), accessories included. Buying recent second-hand gear brings this down to roughly $2,800-3,500.

What is an APO lens, and do beginners need one?

An apochromatic (APO) lens corrects chromatic aberrations for more faithful color and detail rendition. It’s not needed to start. Instead, it’s the typical second- or third-year upgrade, once you have identified your signature focal length. The APO lines from Viltrox and Voigtländer then offer remarkable performance for the price.

Should a beginner start with a prime lens or a zoom?

With a 24-70mm zoom. A prime is an excellent targeted learning tool. However, imposed too early, it mostly creates frustration. A zoom lets you explore every focal length and then choose your prime knowingly. The reverse doesn’t work.

Is a Leica a good first camera?

No. The Leica M system suits experienced photographers. It offers manual rangefinder focusing, no stabilization and no autofocus, and costs over $27,000 with two APO lenses. A high-resolution Sony body delivers equal or better technical performance for a fifth of the price. It can even mount Leica lenses via an adapter.

About the expert consulted for this guide

Jean-Jacques Karatchian is a former member of Leica Camera AG’s professional services department. He has over fifty years of hands-on experience with Leica systems. He also curates the Alain Prost Archives Collection. His input focused on the Leica M system, APO-Summicron-M lenses, and the chromatic-correction standards referenced throughout. These are the sections of this guide most dependent on specialized optical expertise.

Prices are 2026 approximations and may vary by retailer.

Rear view of a vintage gold Mercedes parked before a white mid-century modern house and desert mountains, Palm Springs

29 Jun

Architectural Photography Hub, Blog

Palm Springs Through the Lens: Mid-Century Modernism and Desert Light

Mid-Century Modern architecture in Palm Springs is not merely a collection of buildings; it is a visual language shaped by light, geometry, and cultural intent. The region’s built environment, rooted in the 1940s to 1960s, embodies California modernism at its most refined: clean lines, pastel hues, and open-air living, all under the merciless yet sculptural clarity of desert light. This essay examines how the interplay of architecture, place, and photography creates a distinct aesthetic, one that remains influential in contemporary urban imaging.

Palm Springs functions as an open-air museum of modern design, where every building, from Richard Neutra’s Kaufmann Desert House to Albert Frey’s Tramway Gas Station, is a study in materiality and proportion. The visual stakes lie in the tension between human scale and vast landscapes, captured through high-contrast lighting, symmetry, and the deliberate use of negative space. Photography here is not documentation but interpretation: a means to isolate the essence of modernism while rendering its environmental context.

Historical and Architectural Context

The Mid-Century Modern movement in Palm Springs emerged from a confluence of factors: the post-war migration to Southern California, the influence of Bauhaus principles, and the region’s unique topography. Key architects, Richard Neutra, Albert Frey, Donald Wexler, William Krisel, and E. Stewart Williams, shaped its visual identity with designs that balanced indoor-outdoor living, innovative materials (steel, glass, stucco), and a radical embrace of the desert landscape.

Neutra’s work, for instance, emphasized fluidity between interior and exterior spaces, as seen in the Kaufmann Desert House. Frey, known for his Tramway Gas Station and Palm Springs Visitor Center, introduced playful geometry and pastel palettes that softened the harshness of the Coachella Valley while maintaining a futuristic edge. These designs were not just functional but also deeply tied to place, sited to harness prevailing winds, maximize solar gain, or frame views of the Santa Rosa Mountains.

The Visual Language: Light, Geometry, and Color

The defining characteristic of Palm Springs photography is its high-contrast desert light, which carves the built environment with hard shadows and accentuates texture. This light is both brutal and beautiful, stripping away superfluous detail to reveal the architectural skeleton. Photographers exploit this by positioning subjects in relation to the sun’s arc, capturing buildings at dawn or dusk when shadows are long and directionally precise.

Geometry-driven composition is paramount: symmetry, repetition, and modular forms (e.g., Krisel’s Twin Palms Estates) become visual anchors. The pastel color palette, mint greens, peach, lavender, contrasts with the earthy tones of the desert, creating a retro-futurist effect that is uniquely Californian. Negative space is used to emphasize isolation, often framing structures against the vastness of the Coachella Valley or the jagged silhouette of Joshua Tree.

‘The best Mid-Century photographs in Palm Springs do not show buildings; they reveal the atmosphere in which they exist.’

Key Locations and Their Photographic Potential

Certain sites encapsulate the essence of Palm Springs modernism, each offering distinct photographic opportunities:

Kaufmann Desert House (Neutra): A masterclass in integrating architecture with landscape. Its cantilevered design and steel-and-glass facade challenge the desert environment while maintaining elegance.
The Tramway Gas Station (Albert Frey): A small but iconic structure, its playful geometry and pastel exterior make it a symbol of the movement’s optimism.
Twin Palms Estates (William Krisel): A cluster of homes that exemplify modular design, with repeating forms and terraced layouts that play with perspective.
Palm Springs Visitor Center: Frey’s use of concrete and stained glass creates a striking contrast to the surrounding palm trees, blending modernism with local vernacular.
Vista Las Palmas: A hillside development by Wexler and Williams, offering panoramic views and a study in how architecture adapts to topography.

Each location demands a specific approach, whether it’s the dramatic shadows of the Kaufmann House or the color interplay at Vista Las Palmas.

How to Photograph Palm Springs Modernism

To capture this aesthetic effectively, photographers must consider light as both subject and tool. Golden hour is ideal for softening harsh desert shadows while maintaining contrast; midday light, though stark, can create graphic patterns when used deliberately. Composition should prioritize symmetry, often achieved by centering a structure in the frame with the landscape acting as a mirror or counterpoint.

Color grading plays a critical role: desaturated pastels against warm desert tones create depth, while maintaining high saturation in key elements (e.g., a Frey-designed doorway) draws the eye. Gear choices, wide-angle lenses for environmental shots, normal primes for architectural detail, should align with the intent to either immerse or isolate.

Why This Aesthetic Endures

Palm Springs modernism’s influence persists because it solved problems of climate, lifestyle, and form in a visually coherent way. Today, its principles resonate in sustainable architecture and minimalist design, where the balance between structure and nature is prized. Photographically, the region continues to inspire a cinematic framing style that blends documentary rigor with artistic lyricism, a legacy seen in the work of contemporary architects and image-makers alike.

Palm Springs Prints by Ludwig Favre

The photographs behind this article are available as limited edition fine art prints in the Palm Springs prints collection: the turquoise pool of Palm Springs, Sunrise, the palms and mountains of Desert Sunrise, the Pink Motel at dusk and the classic cars parked in front of mid-century houses. Each is an edition of 30, from 60 x 40 to 180 x 120 cm. Smaller framed pieces are also available in the Square Archive collection.

Edit your desert photos with the same light

My Californian Lightroom presets bring the same warm desert light to your own photos, in Lightroom desktop and mobile. See all Lightroom presets →

Frequently Asked Questions

What defines Mid-Century Modern architecture in Palm Springs?

The style is characterized by clean lines, open floor plans, integration with the desert landscape, and the use of materials like steel, glass, and stucco. It prioritizes functionality while maintaining a futuristic aesthetic, often employing pastel colors and geometric forms.

How does desert light shape photography here?

The high-contrast, directional light creates dramatic shadows that emphasize texture and form. Photographers use this to carve out negative space and highlight architectural details, turning harsh conditions into a visual advantage.

Who are the key architects of this movement in California?

Richard Neutra, Albert Frey, Donald Wexler, William Krisel, and E. Stewart Williams are foundational figures, each contributing distinct innovations to the region’s built environment.

Get the next story first

New photographs from Palm Springs and the American West, a few times a year. Join the newsletter and get 10% off your first fine art print.

What Endures

The legacy of Palm Springs modernism lies in its ability to merge architecture with landscape without compromising either. It remains a touchstone for understanding how design can respond to place while transcending it, a lesson as relevant today as it was in the 1950s.

‘The desert does not forgive; neither should the photograph.’

View from inside a dark boat showing New York skyline silhouettes through rectangular windows at sunset

12 Jun

Blog

Why the Mamiya 7 Still Rules in the Digital Age

The Mamiya 7 vs digital debate keeps coming back. This camera is a relic of another era, yet digital has not replaced it.

Overall, autofocus and AI-driven sensors dominate the conversation. However, the Mamiya 7 thrives in urban documentary work. It does not just compete with digital. It also proves that film is not dead, only different. As a result, the question is no longer whether you should shoot film or digital. It is which one fits the job.

The Mamiya 7 vs Digital: A Fight Neither Side Wanted

The Mamiya 7 was not built to lose. Digital did not invent the medium. It reinvented the rules, and film cameras like this one refused to adapt.

Digital’s speed, convenience and post-processing power are undeniable. However, the Mamiya 7 trades those advantages for something digital cannot replicate: cinematic light. For example, its 6×4.5 negative captures urban scenes with a depth and tone that digital sensors struggle to match. It also renders detail differently, not just more of it.

Film Photography Advantages: Why Grain and Noise Matter in Urban Work

Grain is not a flaw. It is character. Digital noise, for example, is algorithmic and predictable. Film grain, in contrast, is organic and alive. It also reacts to light the way skin does: warm in sunlight, cool under shade.

In urban documentary, this matters. Cities are not flat. They are layered with texture, shadow and mood. Therefore, the Mamiya 7 preserves these layers instead of just recording them. A digital sensor might smooth them out for clarity. Film also embraces the mess.

Urban Documentary with Medium Format: The Mamiya 7’s Unfair Advantage

Medium format is not about resolution. It is about replication. The Mamiya 7’s square negative forces a different way of seeing.

Digital cameras encourage you to frame for the frame. Film, however, forces you to think in negatives. What will this look like on a lightbox? How will the edges behave? As a result, that discipline leads to stronger compositions, even if the final print is smaller than a digital capture.

Cinematic Light in Cities: Why Film Still Looks ‘Better’

Digital cameras are getting better at emulating film. However, they cannot replicate its light response. A Hasselblad or Phase One might mimic film tones, but the Mamiya 7’s negative has a life of its own.

In New York or Paris, light shifts with weather and architecture. Therefore, this response is critical. Film does not just capture light, it interprets it. Digital is precise; film is poetic.

Nostalgia: The Silent Force Behind the Mamiya 7’s Resurgence

Nostalgia is not just about the past. It is about meaning. Digital is efficient. Film is ritualistic.

There is a satisfaction in loading film, winding it and waiting for the results. Digital cannot replace that. Moreover, the ritual changes how you engage with urban subjects. You slow down, and you notice more. That is not just nostalgia, it is better photography.

IA Replication: The Mamiya 7’s Secret Weapon in a Digital World

IA replication is the ability to scan film and match its textures digitally. It is the closest thing to time travel. However, it is not about cheating.

When you replicate film, you preserve a way of seeing that digital has lost. In addition, the Mamiya 7 creates more than images. It creates a reference for future generations. Overall, no digital camera can claim that power.

Conclusion: Digital is a Tool, Film is an Art

The Mamiya 7 is not obsolete, it is just not for every job. Digital excels in speed and flexibility. Film, however, excels in memory.

If you shoot urban documentary, and you care about light as more than exposure data, the Mamiya 7 is still the king. In the Mamiya 7 vs digital debate, it does not need to catch up. It needs to remind us what we have lost.

Wide shot of the TWA Hotel interior featuring curved white architecture, an orange balcony, and bright daylight

25 May

Blog

TWA Hotel: A Mid-Century Suspension in Time

The TWA Hotel in Queens, New York, is a suspended moment in time. Its mid-century bones still hum with the rhythm of jet travel, passengers checking in, planes ascending, the hum of engines blending with the murmur of voices.

Yet it is also a quiet space. The concrete and steel, the angular lines of Eero Saarinen’s design, create a counterpoint to the chaos around it. Here, time feels different. Slower. As if the building itself remembers what travel was like before screens, before noise, before the rush.

Mid-Century as Nostalgia

I am drawn to places like this not just for their architecture but for the emotions they carry. The TWA Hotel is one of those rare spaces where mid-century modernism isn’t just a style, it’s an atmosphere. It reminds me of Palm Springs, of the American Southwest, of the way sunlight hits desert roads and poolside patios in old films.

This is the America I grew up with, the one from 1980s series, from cinematic memories, from a culture that feels both distant and intimate. The TWA Hotel captures that same suspended stillness, as if it were designed to hold onto time itself.

The Poetry of Concrete and Steel

Photography, for me, is about finding the quiet within the obvious. The TWA Hotel’s concrete and steel are not just materials; they are textures that invite contemplation. The way light caresses the curved forms, how shadows stretch like fingers across the floors, these are the details that matter.

I shot this series with a Fujifilm GFX, Mamiya 7 II, its medium-format frame demanding patience. I wanted to slow down, to let the viewer linger on the building’s spatial poetry. The result is a counterpoint: motion in stillness, noise in quiet.

Cinematic Stillness in Motion

The TWA Hotel exists in a liminal space, between departure and arrival, between past and present. My images try to reflect that tension. A shadow falls where no one stands. A reflection flickers on glass, as if catching the last frame of a film reel.

This is not just about the building; it’s about the feeling it evokes. The same way a 1970s soundtrack can transport you, the TWA Hotel does something similar for the eye and mind, a phantom America, both real and imagined.

A Shared Nostalgia

There is no single truth in photography. But there are moments that resonate. For some, this may be nostalgia for a time they never lived through. For others, it might be the recognition of a place that feels familiar, even if they’ve only seen it in a photograph.

The TWA Hotel is one of those places. It exists at the intersection of memory and reality, of what was and what could have been. And in that space, I find my work lives.

The Passage of Time

Nostalgia is a tricky thing. It’s not just about looking back; it’s about the way time itself feels in a place. The TWA Hotel does this because it was designed to move, to breathe with its era, jet travel, the optimism of the 1960s, the promise of global connection.

But today, it also carries the weight of time passing. The airport has grown around it, the world has changed, and yet the building remains. It’s a reminder that some places are not just physical structures but emotional ones too, spaces where we can feel the echoes of what once was.

The Search for Childhood Memories

I think about this when I visit mid-century spaces. It’s not always about my own childhood, but about the way these places hold collective memories. The TWA Hotel does it because of its design, sure, but also because it feels like a portal to another time.

It’s in the way light hits the lobby, in the quiet corners where no one goes, in the way the building seems to whisper stories if you listen closely enough. For me, this is what photography does best: it captures not just places but the feelings tied to them, the ones we carry with us, even if we don’t always notice.

Counterpoint: The TWA Hotel Today

But let’s be honest, nostalgia isn’t always warm and fuzzy. Sometimes it’s bittersweet. The TWA Hotel is a prime example. It’s a place that feels both timeless and out of time, caught between its mid-century glory and the modern airport that surrounds it.

There’s something unsettling about that. It forces you to confront not just the past but also how much has changed. Yet, in that tension, there’s also beauty. The building doesn’t resist progress; it simply exists alongside it, a silent witness to time passing.

Conclusion

The TWA Hotel is more than architecture. It’s a feeling. It’s the way a place can hold onto time, even as the world moves on. If you’ve ever stood somewhere and felt that pull, whether it was a childhood memory or just the echo of something you never lived through, then this is for you.

Take a look. See what lingers there.

Fujifilm X100VI camera with a silver finish on black textured background — limited edition fine art print by Ludwig Favre

13 May

Blog

Why I Chose the Fujifilm X100VI

As a photographer who usually works with medium format and high-end gear, I never expected a compact APS-C camera to become an essential part of my daily creative life. But the Fujifilm X100VI changed that, and then changed my mind again. This isn’t just a technical review; it’s the honest story of why this camera won me over, became my favorite everyday companion, and why I eventually stopped using it.

Falling Back in Love with Spontaneity

When you’re used to shooting with large, heavy cameras, photography becomes a ritual: planning, setup, intention. But what about the unexpected moments? The quiet corners of daily life, the light falling just right on a street, a quick portrait of someone passing by?

The X100VI made me fall in love with spontaneous photography again. It’s light, always with me, and it lets me focus on seeing rather than setting up.

Why I Chose the Fujifilm X100VI

I bought the X100VI for three simple but powerful reasons:

IBIS (In-Body Image Stabilization). A game-changer. I can shoot handheld at slower shutter speeds and still get crisp images. Perfect for low light, or for keeping subtle motion blur intentional rather than accidental.
40MP sensor. That’s a lot of resolution in such a compact body. I can crop in post, print large, and still retain beautiful detail and color depth.
Design and discretion. It looks timeless, almost like a vintage rangefinder, and people don’t read it as a “serious camera.” That helps me capture authentic, unguarded moments, especially when photographing strangers or street scenes.

A Word About Film Simulations

One of the most iconic features of Fujifilm cameras is their film simulations, and the X100VI offers an incredible range. Classic Chrome, Nostalgic Negative, Acros, Provia… each one brings a different emotion and atmosphere.

I often use them as a visual guide while shooting, to see how the light and tones might render. But personally, I shoot mainly in RAW. I like having full control in post-production. Developing the image later in Lightroom, shaping the colors and tones based on how I felt in the moment, feels better than being locked into a baked-in JPEG. Still, I love that Fujifilm gives me both inspiration and flexibility.

Want that Fujifilm look in Lightroom?

My presets are the exact looks I use on my own photography, for Lightroom desktop and mobile: the Fujifilm Collection, the Kodak Film Collection and the Californian presets. See all Lightroom presets →

The Strengths of a Small Sensor

Yes, it’s an APS-C sensor. That’s not a downside. It’s a strength when you put it in context.

Depth of field is easier to manage, which is perfect for street, travel, or spontaneous portraiture.
Lighter lenses, faster autofocus, and better portability are all part of the APS-C charm.
The files are still incredibly detailed, and Fuji’s color science brings everything to life.

Combined with IBIS and high resolution, this small sensor performs far beyond expectations.

Image Quality That Surprises Me Daily

There are days I leave my Hasselblad or Mamiya at home and just carry the X100VI. When I get back and look at the files, I’m genuinely surprised at what this little machine can do.

The tones. The colors. The clarity. Even straight out of camera, the images have depth and soul. But when I process the RAW files, that’s where the magic really happens.

What I Don’t Love (But Can Live With)

No camera is perfect, and the X100VI has a few limitations worth mentioning:

Fixed lens. You have to love this focal length (equivalent to 35mm full frame). It’s versatile, but not for every situation. For my kind of daily work, it’s ideal: fast, discreet, and sharp.
Dynamic range. In extreme lighting situations, it doesn’t have the same highlight retention as a full-frame or medium format sensor. With careful exposure and post-processing, it’s rarely an issue, but it’s there.
Price. The X100VI is not cheap anymore. But you’re paying for build quality, performance, and a unique balance between analog soul and digital reliability.

A Camera That Fits into My Life

Whether I’m walking the streets of Paris, exploring a quiet town in Wyoming, or chasing light in California, the X100VI was always in my bag or around my neck. It didn’t get in the way. It became part of the rhythm of daily life.

It’s the camera I used when I wasn’t “working.” But strangely, some of my favorite images, the most honest, the most intimate, came from it.

Get the next gear test first

I only write about the cameras I actually use, from the Fujifilm X100VI to the GFX 100S and the DJI Osmo Pocket. Join the newsletter to get the next one, and 10% off your first fine art print.

28 Apr

Blog

Hasselblad Masters 2026 finalist

Hasselblad Masters 2026 Finalist, Architecture category.

Published April 28, 2026

The email that changed everything

There are emails you open without thinking, and then there’s that one. The one that starts with “CONGRATULATIONS” in capital letters .

Today, I’m incredibly proud to announce that my photograph has been selected as a finalist in the Hasselblad Masters 2026 the most prestigious photography competition in the world.

Over 100,000 images. One selection.

To grasp what this really means, a few numbers:

Over 100,000 photographs submitted this year a record-breaking total
7 categories spanning every style of photography
Only a handful of finalists per category

Being chosen among these finalists, after a careful pre-selection by the Hasselblad team, means seeing your work recognized at the highest international level. And honestly, I still can’t quite believe it.

What are the Hasselblad Masters?

For more than 20 years, the Hasselblad Masters has celebrated the most talented photographers around the globe. Hasselblad the legendary Swedish brand that traveled to the Moon with the Apollo missions rewards artists who push the boundaries of the image every two years.

TWA-Blog

What’s next? I need you.

The final vote rests on two juries:

The Grand Jury, made up of leading figures in international photography
The Public Jury that’s YOU

The public vote counts as one full jury seat. Every single click can tip the scales.

👉 How to vote?

Head to the official site and support my entry:

https://www.hasselblad.com/inspiration/masters/2026/

Voting is open today through June 2026. Winners will be announced on June 30, 2026.

Thank you

To everyone who has followed my work for years, to those discovering my photos for the first time today, to my family, my friends, and everyone who pushed me to submit despite the doubt: thank you.

This nomination isn’t just a personal milestone. It’s the result of every encounter, every piece of advice, every honest critique that has shaped my vision over the years.

Now, let’s make this vote count. Share, vote, and live this adventure with me.

🔗 Vote for my photo: Hasselblad Masters 2026 — Finalists

📧 Press contact: [email protected]

📸 Follow the journey: instagram : @ludwigfavre

#HasselbladMasters2026 #Photography #Finalist #PhotoContest

27 Apr

Blog

Why You Should Not Buy AI Generated Prints

What the NFT collapse taught us, and what a photograph still does.

In March 2021, Christie’s auctioned a JPEG called Everydays: The First 5000 Days by the artist Beeple for sixty-nine million dollars. The buyer received a string of characters on a blockchain. Within two years the broader NFT market had collapsed by more than ninety-five percent in average value. The same JPEG, today, is worth the price of a coffee. When it sells.

There is a lesson in that sentence, and it is not a technological one. It is the oldest lesson in art collecting: an object without a soul will not hold its value, no matter how loudly the market insists.

The same lesson is now arriving at our doorstep with AI-generated prints.

NOSTALGIA Project

What an AI image actually is

When you ask a model to generate an image of a swimming pool in Palm Springs at sunset, the machine does not go to Palm Springs. It does not stand in the heat. It does not wait for the right hour, the right cloud, the right shadow to fall across the diving board. It searches its training data, finds a statistical average of every image it has ever been shown that resembles “swimming pool, Palm Springs, sunset,” and produces something that looks like the consensus of those images.

There is no encounter. There is no decision. There is no time. There is no place. There is no body in the world doing the looking.

What you receive on paper is the visual equivalent of a sentence written by a calculator: technically correct, statistically plausible, and entirely unwitnessed.

What a photograph actually is

A photograph is the opposite. It is, by its nature, the trace of an encounter. Someone was there. Someone chose to stand at this corner, at this hour, on this morning, for reasons that may not be entirely clear even to them. Someone waited. Someone framed. Someone pressed.

That presence is the entire content of the medium. The French critic Roland Barthes called it the that-has-been: the photograph’s most fundamental claim is that this thing was here, in front of a person, at a moment that will never return.

An AI image cannot make that claim. It can imitate the look, the grain, the color cast. It cannot imitate the having-been-there.

This is not nostalgia. It is the structural difference between a record and a synthesis.

The NFT lesson, in plain language

The NFT bubble was instructive because it tested, with real money, the proposition that a digital image alone, divorced from any physical or experiential anchor, could function as a collectible asset. The market said yes, briefly, at the height of the speculative wave. Then it said no, decisively, when the speculation ended.

What collapsed was not the technology. The technology still works. What collapsed was the assumption that ownership of a generated or replicable image, with no soul behind it, constituted a valuable thing.

AI-generated prints are walking into the same trap, in physical form. The image is impressive on a phone screen. It looks reasonable on a wall. But the moment a collector asks the question that every collector eventually asks, who made this, and why, and was anyone there, the print has nothing to answer with.

The eye that cannot be replicated

There is something a model cannot copy, no matter how many billion images it ingests, and that is a single human eye returning to the same subject for years, deciding what it cares about, refusing to photograph what it doesn’t.

A photographer’s signature is not a graphic style. It is a long catalogue of choices: which corner to stand on, which hour to wait for, which light to refuse, which subject to come back to seven years later because the first photograph was wrong. That accumulated decision-making is what makes a body of work coherent, and what makes a single print belong to it.

When you buy a fine art print, you are buying the result of a specific morning, a specific afternoon, a specific moment when one person decided this frame was the right one. The print is a piece of that decision. The certificate of authenticity is a piece of paper. The decision itself is the actual asset.

A model has no decision. A model has a probability distribution.

The collector’s logic

The art market has always rewarded scarcity, intentionality, and provenance. AI prints fail all three.

Scarcity. The same prompt can generate ten thousand variations. There is no edition because there is no original.

Intentionality. The model has no preference. It does not love the morning light. It does not return to the same building.

Provenance. The chain of decisions behind the image is empty. There is nothing to attribute, nothing to authenticate, nothing to certify in any meaningful sense.

This is why secondary markets for AI prints do not exist, and why they will not exist in the way they exist for photography. The first wave of buyers may pay. The second wave will not.

What you are actually buying

When a print enters your home, you are not only buying an image. You are buying the fact that someone went to make it. You are buying the time, the distance traveled, the hour waited for, the choice that nobody asked for. You are buying, in a real sense, a fragment of someone else’s attention.

That fragment is what makes a print last on a wall and last in a market. It is the only thing that does.

The NFT collapse should have taught us that no amount of technological packaging can substitute for that fragment of attention. The AI print wave is repeating the same mistake, in higher resolution.

Buy the eye. Buy the morning. Buy the decision.

The image is the proof, not the asset.

Discover limited edition fine art photography prints by Ludwig Favre, signed and numbered, made on location across Palm Springs, New York, Paris, Miami, and the California coast.